Chris ([info]randomchris) wrote,
@ 2003-06-06 18:02:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Current mood: thoughtful
Current music:The Simpsons

I have succumbed to the interview meme. Other questions welcome.
(updated: new set of questions and answers added)



I find it interesting that your sermons attract so little attention. Do you believe that people have largely, conciously, decided to become spiritless?
Just because people don't comment doesn't mean they're not paying attention... but there is a distinct lack of a spiritual dimension to most people's lives. The answer is "no". A spiritual dimension is not vital to life, and people can cope without it - that doesn't bother me. What worries me isn't that people have decided to become "spiritless" - it's more that they haven't decided it and have stayed that way through apathy. I have no problem with anyone who thinks about things, and then decides they're an atheist and that there is no world beyond what we see and experience directly. Most people, though, have never made a conscious decision to remove spirituality from their lives - often they've just never thought about any of the big questions, and that's a sad thing.

If you had the choice of a universe that was truly God-less do you believe the world would organize a common series of rules to live by, or would anarchy reign until things broke down into a mad-max endgame?
Hmm... tricky one. After a short time, you'd get several independent communities with rules for themselves which would work in isolation, but inevitably some of these would start to expand and conflict with each other... there would then be a long and rather painful conflict between these communities until they changed to tolerate each other, or until one was victorious. (It could be argued that this is already happening.)

I've always tried to make my own rules flexible, so that if I encounter someone who lives by a different system then the two can coexist - that's the only sustainable option, but in the above situation the communities would all have to start off with very flexible, tolerant rules, and that's unlikely. This is also why I am against evangelistic religions of all kinds.

I know that you're very choiral, but I know nothing of your film interests. What three films are your current favourites?
X-Men 2, definitely. I'm really looking forward to seeing how that develops. I seldom watch films, but other favourites include Shakespeare in Love (Gywneth Paltrow looking nice for once and dressed as a pretty guy, Joe Fiennes, the two of them in bed together... mmm, okay, I'm shallow sometimes) and I also liked Lord of the Rings. I don't go for serious movies - when I watch films, it's to relax.

If you had the opportunity to be worldly famous, what would you like to be famous for?
Composing. I'm working on it (recent choir performance in Canada, and a world premiere in Edinburgh on the 22nd of June).

Going back to religion again which of the sins do you belive to be the most insidious?
(from dictionary.com - working or spreading harmfully in a subtle or stealthy manner; intended to entrap; treacherous; beguiling but harmful; alluring)
If you're referring to the classic seven deadly sins - well, the most insidious to me is sloth. I can easily procrastinate and avoid work, and really have to drive myself quite hard to get work done, and pride is also very easy to let into your life. As for sin as defined last sermon, in the sense of causing spiritual harm to others - ignoring other people's needs and moods and being selfish is one of the easiest and most tempting things to do.

A lot of big budget films have fantastic sound tracks, if you had the chance to go back and either re-write or take credit for the soundtrack to one film which film would it be, and which would you do?
Strangely, I don't often notice film music. It's all very bland and matched to the action, because that's what the directors want. It would have been nice to do Lord of the Rings though, and put in some sung versions of all Tolkien's lyrics from the book as part of it.

Can you pin down the single most, personally, interesting thing you have ever done?
You have touched on one of my deepest fears there... I have a severe insecurity that nothing I've ever done has been particularly interesting. To an outside observer, it would probably be taking the leap to start my own business, but there isn't anything I've done that I find outstandingly interesting.

If you had to eradicate either the Double Bass, or the harmonica from the worlds history which would you choose? WHy?
The harmonica. It's ridiculously limited, you can only put certain combinations of notes together, it's stupidly difficult to play in relation to what you can accomplish with it, and it doesn't fit into any other musical grouping unless the choice of key is shaped around it. The double bass has been vital to the development of the orchestra - if you only had 'cellos, the difference in sound and writing would be very noticeable.

Seriously, c'mon, we all want to know .. what do you think of Morris Dancers?
They are clearly deranged, plotting to take over the world with their evil handkerchiefs and sticks and multiple ties. There's only one troupe left in Scotland, because we realised what all the other ones were up to and burned them at the stake. Bwahahahaha.

Er. Yes. That was a corner of my brain I hadn't used for a while.



(that's [info]epicurial - these html things don't work inside cut text)
1) What, exactly, are the Morris Dancers?
Good point, this may be confusing other non-UK folk (and possibly even some UK folk). They are a strange English country dance tradition. It's something weird involving bells, hankies, sticks, and a person in each troupe called the Fool who wears mismatched socks and either three or four ties at the same time. I wish I was making this up.

2) When you think about how many girls would be willing to sleep with you just because you have a sexy Scottish accent, doesn't it make you regret, just a little bit, that you're gay?
Another note for people who don't know this: I'm actually bisexual, and pretty much 50/50 in terms of attraction to one gender or the other. I've probably not made that obvious, though, due to the lack of female love interest at the moment (or just because guys make themselves a lot more obvious). Not one girl that I've met has shown a desire to sleep with me because of my sexy Scottish accent (or any other reason for that matter :( ) - possibly because I don't have a sexy Scottish accent, but rather one that has been corrupted by four years spent down south and turned into a bastard abomination of an accent which, according to my sister, makes me sound like a fifty-year-old bloke from London. Any attempt to change this makes me sound either ridiculously camp, or drunk and Glaswegian (not sexy, trust me on this.) Again, I wish I was making this up...

3) Would you rather get into a fight with a boxer or a kung-fu master?
Boxer. They can't run after me as fast as a kung-fu master can, and if they caught up with me, they wouldn't expect me to fight dirty and kick them in the balls. Which I would. If anyone seriously wants to fight me, I'll try running away, but when I fight back I do so in order to win, and sod the rules. (On the other hand, it depends which kind of boxer. I'm scared of dogs.)

4) Is it a party in your head, all the time?
Mostly yes, but I'm sitting in the kitchen being boring, enjoying the food, chatting to a few close friends, and trying to ignore the noise and drunk people.

5) What food do you love so much that you'd eat it till you puked?
CHOCOLATE!!! And also fresh strawberries. They don't really work together, surprisingly.


I dread to think which body part is going to answer the next set of questions...




(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ophelia_complex
2003-06-06 10:23 am UTC (link)
I don't necessarily think people are uniterested in spirituality - more that they've maybe had enough of christianity - which really has shown levels of hypocrisy through the ages (esp catholoicism) that must make jesus cringe!

Check out the inquisitions (spanish and italian) the work houses for unmarried-pregnant women in ireland (run by nuns), the behaviour of catholic priests in general...(child abuse) and the general FEAR. the FEAR is something that is instilled into the heart of every catholic - that god is watching you and you will burn in hell for various misdemeanors like sex outside marriage. Dante's inferno - another good example. the wars against other cultures and countries in the name of christianity...
A lot of people think christianity is just a way of controlling the masses.

You can see why modern day society has had enough of religion - ? the past is proof of the torment.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]randomchris
2003-06-06 10:46 am UTC (link)
Yes, many people have done bad things in the name of Christianity. That doesn't make it evil in itself, any more than the crimes that the American government (or the UK government) has committed make it right to bring the government down - it's changed over time. So has Christianity.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]ophelia_complex
2003-06-09 02:08 am UTC (link)
I know. But we need some form of Government system, i think some people have reached the conclusion that they don't need christianity in their lives. Of course Christianity has changed - could catholic priests get away with throwing unmarried, pregnant girls into a workhouse? ;)
I'm not saying its evil -but i can see how the past would put people off - ? can't you? you are what your past is, to a certain extent.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]skx
2003-06-06 10:47 am UTC (link)
That's a very European argument - predicatable enough I guess as we've historically been exposed to Christianity as the religion.

Other nations, regions, and religions have faired better.

Having said that though, even if we take out religion out of the equation then there are many, many, many examples of violence, atrocities, and (dare I say it) terrorism which have occurred which haven't been directly attributed to religion.

So in summery I believe it is deeply unfair to blame religion in general, or Christianity in particular, for the ills of the world. (And that's before even looking at the good sides of an organized religion; comfort, support, understanding, etc).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]ophelia_complex
2003-06-09 02:03 am UTC (link)
I'm not blaming christianity for the ills of the world, you're choosing to be obtuse here. The subject of the post was about christianity, so i didn't bang on about Islam (not all that much better). BUT there is a whole CATALOGUE of pretty sick acts carried out in the name of Jese throughout history I CAN SEE why people might have had enough of it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]skx
2003-06-09 02:25 am UTC (link)
The point was about spirituality and religion in general, not Christianity so I don't think I was being too obtuse.

Yes it's true that there have been attrocities carried out in the name of many religions, but it's also true that many attrocities have been carried out without any religious backgrounds...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re:
[info]ophelia_complex
2003-06-09 02:38 am UTC (link)
thats true. terrorism doesn't need a religious cover (but its very often got one) a lot of the times, religion is just a front for terrorist acts (i.e. northen Ireland - its not really about catholics and protestants anymore). But religion is a very spiritual thing, so therefore i don't feel it sits well for something spiritual to be involved in something evil or debased. Just a point of view

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]skx
2003-06-06 10:49 am UTC (link)
Thanks for taking the time to answer those, your responses were certainly very interesting :)

So there's a significant think you've done ... made me think at least!

(Reply to this)


[info]epicurial
2003-06-06 10:58 am UTC (link)
1) What, exactly, are the Morris Dancers?
2) When you think about how many girls would be willing to sleep with you just because you have a sexy Scottish accent, doesn't it make you regret, just a little bit, that you're gay?
3) Would you rather get into a fight with a boxer or a kung-fu master?
4) Is it a party in your head, all the time?
5) What food do you love so much that you'd eat it till you puked?

(Reply to this)


[info]emchen
2003-06-06 04:01 pm UTC (link)
If u are terry pratchett, Morris Dancers are very very dangerous. They can knock you out with one fell whoop with their sticks. Watch out for them

(Reply to this)


[info]epicurial
2003-06-06 07:17 pm UTC (link)
The trick is you have to LEAVE the UK for people to notice the sexy UK accent. Otherwise nobody notices because everybody sounds like that.

(You're kidding about the Morris dancers though, aren't you? Aren't you?)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]randomchris
2003-06-07 02:29 am UTC (link)
Aha. In that case, beware when I head over to Vancouver in September. I shall use my new-found powers! Bwahahahaha!

No, I'm not kidding about the Morris Dancers. Try Google.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]alwaschoen
2003-06-07 02:58 am UTC (link)
For the record, I know just as many guys as girls who would go for a guy with a sexy Scottish accent. Since most of them are American college students, they probably couldn't tell a Scottish accent from the accent of a fifty-year-old Londoner, anyway.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]randomchris
2003-06-07 03:35 am UTC (link)
Yes, I've had one guy go for my sexy Scottish accent (first serious relationship) which was nice. I'll keep an open mind in Vancouver - as if I could do anything else :)

I suspect they could - they've all seen Austin Powers. The damage that movie has done to the reputation of Britons abroad is incalculable...

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(14 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…